Execute the Pushback

Against Deceptions Forwarded by Artificial Intelligence

In my humble opinion, it is very likely that significant global supply-chain breakdowns, far greater than the ones we are currently experiencing, will begin progressing with alarming frequency by mid-2024 to mid-2025.  AI’s support of the Ruling Class’s false narratives will continue to shape global sentiment into a slave-like hive incapable of exercising any critical thought. In August of 2023, I already consider the consensus hive-like support for Ruling Class false narratives among the general masses so horrifying that I can’t even fathom it becoming much worse than it stands at the current time even though I know it will.

For those that remain sceptical of my thesis, I refer you to Exhibit A, a podcast I published near the end of 2021 in which I stated, in vehement opposition to mass-media Ruling Class narratives widely distributed at the time, that covid lockdowns were NOT going to end once the new year arrived. In fact, I stated that global covid lockdowns would last a minimum of at least one more year and predicated my prediction entirely on global economic, not health issues, which may seem oxymoronic to most people reading this article, especially for those that fell hook, line and sinker for the false narrative that lockdowns were enforced by governments to protect our health. Thus, even though my prediction came true (China announced the end of lockdowns on 27 December 2022!), and I reviewed the global money flows that explained why the lockdowns could end at the start of 2023 but not before then, I was already observing years ago, how AI controlled social media platforms were causing billions to develop a strong distaste and disdain for truth.

Is There a Silver Lining in Any of the Above?

Believe it or not, my answer is yes. Of the 300 to 600 million jobs AI is expected to eradicate along with perhaps several hundred million more jobs lost to medically declared disabilities in coming years,  the need for more _______ analysts (fill in the blank with financial, political, medical, etc.) will never disappear. in fact, the need for such truthful analysts will multiply as so few of us remain today, and even fewer of us will remain by the end of next year. Analysts in all topical areas that simply make a boatload of money from telling the people what they want to hear will always remain. The masses will believe the garbage they vomit even more as their narratives will be reinforced with AI narratives, and the amount of people in this world that will sacrifice their values and morals for money and fame will remain limitless. AI will not change that constant.

However, neither will AI change the number of those that will never sacrifice their values and morals for money and fame. I’ve met a handful of such people that exist in this rarified air during my lifetime and I am 100% convinced that such people cannot be lured away from their constant north as well. For those that may feel discouraged because they believe such people are a dying breed, watch this video of three entertainment icons I posted on my telegram channel for a few examples of people that refused to sell out their values for money. Though exceedingly and increasingly rare, they still do exist.

Thus, in certain arenas, human analysis will always provide far greater insight and far greater applicable real-world value than AI analysis in many arenas of life and death significance due to the unparalleled ability of humans to perceive the differences between reality and artificially created perceptions presented to us and widely accepted by the masses as truth. If you recall the chart from part one of this two-part article that outlined all the industries projected to lose the most jobs to AI automation, of all the industries projected to lose significant numbers of jobs to AI automation, education was at the bottom for projected losses of jobs.

I think even analysts have come to the same realization as I, that AI cannot replace human objectivity and the discernment of lies within the realm of education. If there is a single thing of which I am certain in a sea of unpredictability when it comes to the progression of AI, it is that Ruling Class members will use AI in whatever capacity they can to censor and stop the spread of truth and that analysts who stand by truth will become exceedingly rare.

I am certain that no news forwarded and disseminated by AI in the topics most critical to our health (mental and financial) and survival will be able to rival the honesty, integrity, intellect and value of human analysis unless a radically different transformative approach to AI information takes place.

But as long as AI continue to learn from completely censored algorithms like Google and Facebook algorithms and the like, and from being programmed by members of the Ruling Class, the possibility of such a transformation is not even 0.01% but zero percent.

Thus, if you would like to stop worrying about the longevity of your current career, simply pursue one in analysis in any subject matter critical to our quality of life. Even if the current pathway of information was not dictated by the Ruling Class and AI was already sentient today, given that it is learning by observing human behavior of the most powerful men and women on our planet that retain the power to decide who lives and dies through lockdown policies, the nations that partake in war even if 90% of their national population is opposed, and what untested medications must be consumed for people to keep their jobs, AI would still learn to lie to us on its own.

To believe that AI financial analysis will eventually replace human analysis is laughable because even though AI analytics will be able to analyze millions of data points within seconds and spot trading patterns impossible before the progression of AI to this point, if AI is non-sentient, that means the same untrustworthy suspects like JP Morgan, Citibank, HSBC, Barclays, Deutsche Bank and Central Bank bankers will retain control of all of this data and possess the resultant AI analysis that they will of course, never share with the public. They will never release the results of AI analysis to us and likely release the exact opposite of truth to us as they always have done.

For example, many people read the story about JP Morgan banker Greg Shearer stating his bullish stance on gold on 26 July (I’ve been stating my bullish stance on gold since gold was trading at $560 an ounce), and were perhaps surprised that JP Morgan, one of the biggest manipulators of synthetic PM prices to the downside, was publicly releasing a bullish stance on gold from one of their analysts. Number one, Shearer’s announcement would have only been surprising to those that do not understand the level of psyops that bankers continuously run.  The fact that gold prices will